A few times in a professional tennis match I have seen a player win a point on a between the legs shot. It seems to happen more often now, but how can you not help but feel embarrassed for the guy losing the point? I felt sympathy for Djokovic when Federer hit this amazing 'tweener at the 2009 US Open.
Fed 'Tweener 2009 US Open
Well guess what? As of Sunday when I was age 38 (now I am 39 and a lot wiser) I also lost a point off of a 'tweener. I was a little bit embarrassed especially since I know my friend Brad will never let me forget it. I can see reenactments coming at practice of Brad's 'tweener. Unfortunately (actually I am very happy no one recorded it) I do not have video evidence to show you the carnage, but trust me it happened. Just ask Brad...
Now you might be thinking "Larry, you lost that point because you thought you had it won." I would agree with you, but I did not stand at the baseline as many players, at least recreational players, do. I charged the net, was in perfect position, and was ready, sort of.
What happened? I lobbed Brad who was at the net. As Brad ran back I am thinking "he is going to try a 'tweener". Brad did just that and hit the 'tweener with some stick. I was ready for a weak shot at best, but not a line drive! When he ripped the 'tweener to at my backhand I attempted a high backhand volley and hit it well, but in the net. I was ready but I was not really ready. Not for a high backhand volley off a ball that was coming hard from a "maginficent 'tweener" (Brad's addition to my perspective on the point). I remember thinking "you have got to be kidding me". "How did I miss that? How was he able to hit that over?" I think I also remember Brad laughing after he won the point. I knew I was not going to be able live it down (why I am writing about in my blog I am still not quite sure other than Brad wants this in recorded history for all to read).
Losing a 'Tweener
Losing the 'tweener is a good reminder, as Brad pointed out to me in a text, that you have to be ready to play every ball even if your opponent clearly would have to "tree" to make it (hey Brad I know your practice that shot but, come on, that well?). Do not assume your opponent will miss the shot or even hit a weak shot. Be ready at all times. Even at age 39 you can relearn some old lessons. I am not the only one who needs to take something from this situation. Brad had this to say about what he could learn,
“When I’ve managed to pull off the impossible and hit a ‘tweener, it’s never been a clean winner. All three times (That’s right, I’ve done it three times in match play), my opponent had a makeable volley that was blown due to being star struck by my glorious ‘tweener. Even I will admit that at the point of actually trying to hit a ‘tweener its all or nothing time, but I assume the ball isn’t coming back and never prepare for the next shot. It will happen eventually and I won’t be ready.”
Novak Djokovic, Brian Dabul and others that have been tortured by Roger Federer's 'tweener I can empathize with you now. Losing that point reminded to be ready at all times. Good news is that losing the 'tweener point did not cost me a match. Lesson learned and I won't forget it, trust me!
Read User's Comments(0)
Should you choose to return serve when you win the spin? Greg Moran from TennisOne
A Different Type of Percentage Play
Greg Moran
[TennisOne Classic]
I’m constantly amazed when I see a player win the pre-match spin and almost reflexively elect to serve. When I ask these players why they make this choice, they think for a moment and then say, "it’s an advantage to serve first……………..isn’t it?"
The pros almost always elect to serve first. The serve is the most important shot in the game and most professionals have a good one, so for them the decision is usually a no-brainer. However, if you're like me, you're not receiving a check for your match results on the tennis court so the subject requires a bit more thought.
 Click here: If you're like most, your serve doesn't vaguely resemble that of Pete Sampras or anyone you might see on TV, so why opt to serve first? |
Serving first is the right choice because serving is an advantage, isn't it? Well, theoretically, yes. But realistically is it the correct decision? At he club level, most of the time, probably not!
Serving at the recreational level is often a disadvantage for the simple fact that many recreational players do not have particularly good serves. To anyone insulted by that statement, I apologize but, hey, we’re talking competitive tennis here and, more often than not, serving first does not provide an advantage.
The pros tend to hold serve (win their service games) about 85% of the time. At the recreational levels I estimate the percentages are approximately as follows:
- 1.0-2.0: 20%
- 2.0-3.0: 30%
- 3.0-4.0: 40%
- 4.0-4.5: 50%
- 4.5-5.5: 60%
As you can see, until you reach the 4.5-5.0 level serving tends to be a risky affair at best. That is why I suggest you choose to receive serve if you win the opening spin of the racquet. Here are a few reasons why:
1. You'll catch your opponent cold. Like most recreational players, they've probably hit three or four serves and then boldly proclaim they're ready to go. Believe me, they're not! They'll undoubtedly still be a bit stiff as well as suffering from opening game jitters.
Plus, at the recreational levels, there's often the old "first ball in" (FBI) rule in effect (especially among women) meaning that on the first point the server gets to keep hitting serves until one goes in. This concept was invented for one reason: so that the players don't have to waste valuable court time on something as insignificant as warming up their serves.
Plus, at the recreational levels, there's often the old "first ball in" (FBI) rule in effect (especially among women) meaning that on the first point the server gets to keep hitting serves until one goes in. This concept was invented for one reason: so that the players don't have to waste valuable court time on something as insignificant as warming up their serves.
 Click here: Take a lesson from Andre Agassi, after winning the toss, he often chose to receive. |
So what happens? The player serving first takes no warm-up serves, says "FBI" and away they go. Many times in "FBI" games the first ball actually does go in and then the server's really in trouble. The server now have to serve the rest of the game with what amounts to only one warm-up serve.
A quick point here: if you do get caught in one of those "first ball in games" be certain to intentionally miss your first 10-15 serves so that you can loosen your arm up. By doing so, you'll not only warm your arm up, you'll most probably annoy your opponents to the point where they'll agree to a proper service warm-up before beginning the match.
2. You'll have more time to warm-up, relax and get into the match. In addition, you'll be looser when it's your turn to serve.
3. Again, most players below the 5.0 level simply don't have very good serves. Sorry, but it's true. Many players at the club level find practicing their serve boring so they let it slide. As a result, they adopt the old "boom" and "plop" strategy that is so prevalent today.
Of course there are exceptions to the rule. If you have confidence in your serve, and I don't mean the "I have a great serve when it goes in" type of confidence, then you should serve first. Also, if your opponent truly has a great serve you may want to serve first. However, keep in mind that even a great server is a bit stiff and jittery serving for the first time, so it may be a good time to go for an early service break.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)